Friday, 3 February 2017

Fact Checker: President Trump's immigration executive order, by the (non-alternative) facts.

President Trump’s immigration executive order, by the (non-alternative) facts. A week ago today, President Trump signed an immigration executive order heard around the world. Amid the confusion over the order’s application and legality were many dubious facts, so we set the record straight on several aspects of the order. Did Trump’s travel ban only affect …
 
Fact Checker
The truth behind the rhetoric
 
 

President Trump’s immigration executive order, by the (non-alternative) facts.

A week ago today, President Trump signed an immigration executive order heard around the world. Amid the confusion over the order’s application and legality were many dubious facts, so we set the record straight on several aspects of the order.

Did Trump’s travel ban only affect a “universe of 109 people”?

No. Trump and the White House played down the travel ban’s impact, saying 109 of 325,000 people were stopped because of it. Under the order, visa holders from seven mostly-Muslim countries can’t travel to the United States for at least 90 days. But 109 is actually the number of people who were flying at the time the order was signed, not the full universe of people affected by the travel ban.

In reality, about 90,000 visas are affected. That’s how many people who received either nonimmigrant or immigrant visas in fiscal 2015 from the seven countries (Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Syria, Libya and Yemen) listed in Trump’s executive order. We awarded Four Pinocchios.

Is Trump’s policy “similar to what President Obama did in 2011″?

Not really. Obama didn’t announce a ban on visa applications. There were reported delays in processing Iraqi refugee background checks after a 2011 case involving two Iraqi refugees in Bowling Green, Ky. Federal officials had found that the two men had attempted to help terrorist activities against U.S. soldiers in Iraq. (This is what White House senior adviser Kellyanne Conway later called the “Bowling Green massacre,” which, of course, didn’t happen. She later called it an “honest mistake.”)

There were new screening procedures, but there wasn’t a policy that prevented all citizens from a country, like Trump’s executive order. We awarded Three Pinocchios.

Are foreign-born people more likely to attack the U.S. homeland?

The order says "numerous foreign-born individuals have been convicted or implicated in terrorism-related crimes since Sept. 11, 2001.” Of about 400 individuals charged with or credibly involved in jihad-inspired activity in the U.S. since 9/11, just under half (197) were U.S.-born citizens, according to research by the nonpartisan think tank New America Foundation. Another 82 were naturalized citizens and 44 were permanent residents.

Homegrown terrorism is a growing concern, especially among American citizens who are radicalized online. In fact, it was American-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki who has had the most widespread influence on radicalization, even more than five years after his death. We explored this question and some others in our Q&A about the executive order.

Enjoy this newsletter? Forward it to someone else who'd like it! If this e-mail was forwarded to you, sign up here for the weekly newsletter. Hear something fact-checkable? Send it here, we’ll check it out. 

ADVERTISEMENT
 

We fact-check Democrats, too.

We’re committed to holding the powerful accountable, regardless of their party. Our focus lately has been falsehoods by the incoming White House, but we’re always on the lookout for claims by politicians of all party affiliations. About 50 percent of our fact-checks come from reader inquiries, so send us your fact-check suggestions.

With the Supreme Court nomination of Neil Gorsuch this week, we fact-checked Senate Democrats’ slippery language about the confirmation process. Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), claimed Gorsuch “should meet the voting standard that Supreme Court nominees are held to of 60 votes, a standard that was met by Elena Kagan as well as Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama's choices.”

But 60 votes is not "a standard" for Supreme Court confirmations. In fact, two of the current justices on the court did not meet that supposed standard. We awarded Two Pinocchios to this misleading language.

Thank you, readers!

Traffic to the Fact Checker is at an all-time high. We shattered our own traffic record in January 2017, when our monthly unique visitor count was 50 percent higher than the previous monthly record, set in October 2016.

Thank you for caring about the truth and facts. Don’t forget to subscribe to The Washington Post!

Fact Checker cameo on this week's "Full Frontal with Samantha Bee"

Fact Checker cameo on this week’s “Full Frontal with Samantha Bee”

We’re always looking for suggestions. If you hear something fact-checkable, fill out this form, e-mail us or tweet us: @myhlee@GlennKesslerWP or using #FactCheckThis. Read about our rating scale here, and sign up here for our weekly Fact Checker newsletter. 

Scroll down for this week’s Pinocchio roundup.

— Michelle Ye Hee Lee

 
The number of people affected by Trump’s travel ban: About 90,000
Trump likes to cite a very small figure to minimize the impact of his travel ban. But that's highly misleading.
 
Trump’s claim taking credit for cutting $600 million from the F-35 program
Once again, we award Trump Pinocchios for taking undue credit.
 
Alabama congressman’s unsupported claim that Democrats rigged voting machines in his election
There's no evidence to back up this claim.
 
Trump’s facile claim that his refugee policy is similar to Obama’s in 2011
Trump says his refugee ban reflects a 2011 Obama policy concerning Iraq. But there are some important differences.
 
 
Fact-checking Trump’s rhetoric on crime and the ‘American carnage’
We dig into the statistics and facts underlying Trump's rhetoric on crime trends.
 
Trump’s claim that he did ‘substantially’ better with blacks than other GOP presidential candidates
Trump actually did worse among blacks than any Republican candidate running against a white Democrat
 
Trump’s claim that it is ‘very tough’ for Christian Syrians to get to the United States
Relatively few Christians have been admitted as refugees from Syria. But that doesn't mean they have been subject to discrimination.
 
Senate Democrats’ misleading language on a 60-vote ‘standard’ for Supreme Court nominees
Two of the justices on the Supreme Court failed to meet a "standard" claimed by Democrats.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Paul Ryan’s claim that ‘more and more doctors just won’t take Medicaid’
Ryan highlights real challenges in the Medicaid program, but there are not enough data to support his specific claim.
 
What Trump got wrong on Twitter this week (#4)
The fourth installment in our occasional feature looking at what Trump got wrong on Twitter in a given week.
 
Kellyanne Conway’s claim of a ‘Bowling Green massacre’
A top White House aide claimed a "massacre" that didn't happen. Here's what did happen.
 
What you need to know about the terrorist threat from foreigners and Trump’s executive order
Here are some facts about Trump's authority to ban foreigners, and the terror threat posed by refugees and other individuals born outside of the U.S.
 
Recommended for you
 
Today's WorldView
What's most important from where the world meets Washington, plus the day's most essential reads and interesting ideas.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2017 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment