| The AP focused on 85 out of 154 people who met with Clinton but were not foreign government representatives or federal employees. It is based on partial records released by the State Department so far and does not reflect the full scope of people with whom Clinton met as secretary of state. "15 million new jobs? 15 million new jobs?" –Kaine This is wrong. Counting from January 2009, there have been nearly 11 million private-sector jobs created in the United States, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. If you count all jobs, including government jobs, the figure is 10.5 million. So how does Kaine come up with 15 million? He's counting from the low point for jobs in Obama's presidency — February 2010. When you start the clock from then, the tally is 15 million private-sector jobs and 14.8 million overall jobs. The last time we checked, February 2010 was 6 1/2 years ago. So with this claim, Kaine is trying to wipe off a year of Obama's presidency. Moreover, as a general matter, regular readers know that we tend to discount job-creation records by a president, as so much of the record is due to economic forces beyond a president's control. "Independent analysts say the Clinton plan would grow the economy by 10.5 million jobs. The Trump plan would cost 3.5 million jobs." –Kaine Mark Zandi, a respected economist at Moody's Analytics, did issue a report saying that if Trump's economic plans were fully implemented, 3.5 million jobs would disappear, incomes would stagnate, debt would explode, and stock prices would plummet. (This compares to an anticipated increase of 6 million jobs under current Obama administration policies.) Zandi, in another report, also said that if Clinton were able to fully implement her economic plans, the economy would add an additional 3.2 million jobs during the first four years of her presidency. Combined with anticipated job creation under current law, that adds up to 10.4 million jobs. But both reports were highly skeptical that either candidate would be able to get their plans through Congress, including Trump even if Congress was controlled by Republicans–because so many of his positions are such a departure from Republican principles. Even so the report said the U.S. economy would likely suffer under a Trump presidency. (The report was issued in June and Moody's has not issued an updated report that would reflect additional policies announced by trump, including a revised tax plan, but the report said Trump's trade policies would be especially damaging.) "A reference to the Iranian deal, the Iranian deal that Hillary Clinton initiated, $150 billion to the radical mullahs in Iran." –Pence Pence makes it sound like this is U.S. taxpayer money — and he uses a too-high estimate. Because of international sanctions over its nuclear program, Iran had billions of dollars in assets that were frozen in foreign banks around the globe. With sanctions lifted, in theory those funds would be unlocked. But the Treasury Department has estimated that once Iran fulfills other obligations, it would have about $55 billion left. (Much of the other money was obligated to illiquid projects in China.) For its part, the Central Bank of Iran said the number was actually $32 billion, not $55 billion. "That's why Donald Trump's claim that he wants to — that NATO is obsolete and that we need to get rid of NATO is so dangerous." –Kaine Trump has called the North Atlantic Treaty Organization obsolete but he has not said he wants to get rid of it. Asked specifically by The Washington Post in March if he wanted to pull out of NATO, he said: I don't want to pull it out. NATO was set up at a different time. NATO was set up when we were a richer country. We're not a rich country anymore. … I think NATO as a concept is good, but it is not as good as it was when it first evolved." He has argued that "distribution of costs" has to be changed, but as we have noted, Trump frequently overstates the burden on the United States. "We will never, ever engage in a risky scheme to privatize Social Security. Donald Trump wrote a book and he said Social Security is a Ponzi scheme and privatization would be good for all of us." –Kaine Kaine is referring to Trump's 2000 book, "The America We Deserve," where he made such a comparison about Social Security and said he wanted to privatize the program: "The workers of America have been forced to invest a sixth of our wages into a huge Ponzi scheme. The pyramids are made of papier-mache." Trump added in the book: "Privatization would be good for all of us. As it stands today, 13.6 percent of women on Social Security live in poverty." But that book was published 16 years ago. On the campaign trail, Trump has said he wants to "keep Social Security intact … I'm not going to cut it." His specific plans for the program, however, are vague. His campaign has said "the key to preserving Social Security and other programs that benefit AARP members is to have an economy that is robust and growing." For more on Social Security and allegations it is a Ponzi scheme, see The Fact Checker's guide to critical questions about the program. "We have the smallest Navy since 1916." –Pence This is a zombie claim that just won't go away. We have awarded it Three Pinocchios, and fact checkers repeatedly debunked this in the 2012 presidential elections. Indeed, the number of ships (272) as of Oct. 4, 2016 is the lowest count since 1916 (245 ships). But a lot has changed in 100 years, including the need and capacity of ships. After all, it's a now a matter of modern nuclear-powered fleet carriers, versus gunboats and small warships of 100 years ago. The push for ships under the Reagan era (to build the Navy up to 600-ship levels) no longer exists, and ships from that era are now retiring. This talking point is a poor way to depict the country's naval fleet needs. Gunboats of 1915 and aircraft carriers of 2015 are not the same. And military budget, fleet needs and historical circumstances are much different in 2015 than they were in 1916. "We ought to deploy a missile defense shield to the Czech Republic and Poland which Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama pulled back on out of not wanting to offend the Russians back in 2009." –Pence Pence reprises a GOP talking point from the 2012 campaign, but it's not correct. Obama substituted a different system, but it was on the recommendation of then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates, a Republican. Gates, in fact, had recommended the original plan to George W. Bush and then decided the new system implemented by Obama was more effective, less costly and timelier than the Bush plan. Gates, in his 2013 memoir, noted that while the Obama administration had stumbled in failing to lay the diplomatic groundwork for the shift, looking "like a bunch of bumbling fools," the Bush plan was already running into trouble in both Prague and Warsaw and likely would have been rejected by parliaments in both countries. "The Polish and Czech governments were relieved," he wrote. "I sincerely believed the new program was better — more in accord with the political realities in Europe and more effective against the emerging Iranian threat," Gates added. "While there certainly were some in the State Department and the White House who believed the third site in Europe was incompatible with the Russian 'reset,' we in Defense did not. Making the Russians happy wasn't exactly on my to-do list." In fact, Gates says, the Russians quickly concluded that the Obama plan was even worse from their perspective, as it eventually might have capabilities that could be used against Russian intercontinental missiles. "How ironic that U.S. critics of the new approach had portrayed it as a big concession to the Russians," Gates added sardonically. "It would have been nice to hear a critic in Washington — just once in my career — say,Well I got that wrong." "Donald Trump said wages are too high. And both Donald Trump and Mike Pence think we ought to eliminate the federal minimum wage. Mike Pence, when he was in Congress, voted against raising the minimum wage above $5.15." –Kaine Trump has walked back the particular claim that Kaine cites, that "wages are too high." Of course, Trump has flip-flopped on the minimum wage at least five times since August 2015 and has consistently contradicted his own statements, making it hard to track exactly where he stands on the issue at a given time. Trump's stance on this matter, as of August 2016, was that he supports "raising it to $10 at the federal level, but believes states should set the minimum wage as appropriate for their state." During a November 2015 Republican primary debate, Trump was asked whether he was "sympathetic to the protesters' cause since a $15 wage works out to about $31,000 a year." His full answer, with the part Kaine is quoting in bold: "I can't be, Neil. And the reason I can't be is that we are a country that is being beaten on every front economically, militarily. There is nothing that we do now to win. We don't win anymore. Our taxes are too high. I've come up with a tax plan that many, many people like very much. It's going to be a tremendous plan. I think it'll make our country and our economy very dynamic. But, taxes too high, wages too high, we're not going to be able to compete against the world. I hate to say it, but we have to leave it the way it is. People have to go out, they have to work really hard and have to get into that upper stratum. But we cannot do this if we are going to compete with the rest of the world. We just can't do it." Days later, Trump clarified he was referring to whether he would increase the minimum wage. He would not raise it, because then it would be "too high," he said. Kaine correctly notes that Pence, as a congressman, voted in 2007 against raising the minimum wage above $5.15. "More and more young people today are embracing life." –Pence Pence made this claim in the context of abortion and choosing whether to be for or against abortion rights. But polling does not support this. In fact, it shows young adults' views on abortion rights are about the same as their elders — unlike issues like marijuana and gay marriage, where young people are more liberal. Among adults aged 18 to 29, 58 percent said abortion should be legal in all or more cases, and 39 said it should be illegal in all or most cases, according to a 2014 Pew Research Center poll. That was similar to those aged 30 to 49 (59 percent supported abortion, 38 percent opposed) and those aged 50 to 64 (56 percent supported, 37 percent opposed). "But what I can't understand is with Hillary Clinton and now Senator Kaine at her side is to support a practice like partial-birth abortion." –Pence "Partial-birth abortion" is usually used to refer to later-term abortions using a specific fetus-extraction method. Clinton has said she supports a ban on late-term abortions, including partial-birth abortions, as long as the health and the life of the mother is protected. As senator, Clinton opposed the Partial-Birth Abortion Act of 2003, which did not include a health exception. Earlier this year, Clinton again said she is "on record in favor of a late pregnancy regulation that would have exceptions for the life and health of the mother." Kaine: "More nations should get nuclear weapons. Try to defend that." Pence: "Don't put words in my mouth. Well, he never said that, Senator." Kaine: "He absolutely said it. Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Japan." Trump has, indeed, said that countries like South Korea, Japan and Saudi Arabia should have nuclear weapons because nuclear proliferation is inevitable. Trump has said that countries like Japan and South Korea would be "better off" if they were armed with nuclear weapons, in order to defend themselves from North Korea. And Trumps said he considers nuclear weapons a last resort, though he would not "rule anything out" regarding their use. For example, during a March CNN town hall, Trump was asked: "So if you said, Japan, yes, it's fine, you get nuclear weapons, South Korea, you as well, and Saudi Arabia says we want them, too?" Trump answered: "Can I be honest with you? It's going to happen, anyway. It's going to happen anyway. It's only a question of time. They're going to start having them or we have to get rid of them entirely. But you have so many countries already, China, Pakistan, you have so many countries, Russia, you have so many countries right now that have them." "She [Clinton] went toe-to-toe with Russia and lodged protests when they went into Georgia." –Kaine This is an odd, inaccurate comment. The Russia-Georgia war took place in 2008, when Clinton was still a U.S. senator. Bush's Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, lodged the protests. Whatever diplomatic pressure the Bush team had put on Russia over Georgia was abandoned when President Obama was elected and the administration decided to pursue the ill-fated "reset." Pence: "Less than 10 cents on the dollar of the Clinton Foundation has gone to charitable causes." Kaine: "Ninety percent." Kaine gets this right, as Pence repeated a false claim that is popular on the right. The Clinton Foundation does not dole out grants, like a typical foundation, but instead directs the donations it raises directly for specified charitable activities. So simply only looking at the grants does not tell the whole story about the Foundation's activities. The American Institute of Philanthropy's "Charity Watch" gives the Clinton Foundation an "A" rating for its efficiency (the top rating is A+). It says the Foundation spends 88 percent of its expenses on programs and 12 percent on overhead. It also says the Clinton Foundation spends just $2 to raise $100. Enjoy this newsletter? Forward it to someone else who'd like it! If this e-mail was forwarded to you, sign up here for the weekly newsletter. Hear something fact-checkable? Send it here, we’ll check it out. |
No comments:
Post a Comment