| By Lawrence H. Summers John Williams has written the most thoughtful piece on monetary policy that has come out of the Fed in a long time. He recognizes more explicitly than others that the neutral interest rate is now very low and quite likely will remain very low for a long time to come. As … | | |  | | | | The latest economic and domestic policy from Wonkblog | | | | |  . (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images) By Lawrence H. Summers John Williams has written the most thoughtful piece on monetary policy that has come out of the Fed in a long time. He recognizes more explicitly than others that the neutral interest rate is now very low and quite likely will remain very low for a long time to come. As he recognizes, this the essence of the secular stagnation concern that I and others have been expressing for the last three years. I now believe that it just as reasonable to suppose that neutral rates will fall further as it is to suppose they will revert toward historically normal levels. First, there is a kind of hysteresis in rates in which a lower interest rate today tends to lower the neutral rate in the future. To the extent that low rates stimulate spending by pulling forward investment, low rates today reduce neutral rates tomorrow by moving investment forward. Second, major structural factors like rising inequality, slowing labor force growth, lower capital goods prices, slowing productivity growth and more capital outflows from developing countries appear to represent continuing trends. Third, there is the prospect that the growing expectation that rates will be low for a long time decreases the spending of target savers and interferes with financial intermediation. | | | Williams rightly, if rather tentatively, draws the conclusions that a chronically very low neutral rate has important policy implications. Read the rest on Wonkblog. Chart of the day Middle-class jobs are coming back. Ylan Q. Mui has more.  Top policy tweets "Justice Department says it will end use of private prisons https://t.co/xZ20mBzeAg" -- @crampell "A look at the most important choices a President Clinton would have to make in putting together her economic team. https://t.co/IkCLlyg6v8" -- @jeffspross "Jacob Hacker, the father of the public option, explains why Obamacare's troubles show why the idea is necessary https://t.co/GAG96Aq6qz" -- @ezraklein | | | | | | | | | | | ©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071 | | | | | | | | |
No comments:
Post a Comment