Tuesday, 23 August 2016

Wonkbook: Private prisons aren't that big a deal

By Keith Humphreys Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates has announced that the federal government will begin reducing its use of private prisons. Former presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, who campaigned for such a policy change, spoke for many liberal politicians when he praised the move as a major step toward reducing mass incarceration: "It is an international …
 
Wonkbook
The latest economic and domestic policy from Wonkblog
 
 
COLEMAN, FL  –  APRIL 9: The 8X13 dimensions of a sparse prison cell houses 2 inmates at FCI Coleman Medium - Federal Bureau of Prisons, in Coleman, Florida, on Monday, April 9, 2015. The drab setting is devoid of everyday clutter of life on the outside. (Photo by Nikki Kahn/The Washington Post)

(Nikki Kahn/The Washington Post)

By Keith Humphreys

Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates has announced that the federal government will begin reducing its use of private prisons. Former presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, who campaigned for such a policy change, spoke for many liberal politicians when he praised the move as a major step toward reducing mass incarceration: "It is an international embarrassment that we put more people behind bars than any other country on earth. Due in large part to private prisons, incarceration has been a source of major profits to private corporations." Yet despite the outsize attention they draw in some political quarters, private prisons are bit players in the sorry drama of mass incarceration.

That 19 percent of federal prisoners are in private facilities may seem to imply a massive presence of corporations within U.S. corrections, but the federal government houses only 12.7 percent of U.S. inmates. As a result, even if the Justice Department went beyond its announced plans and immediately transferred all privately housed inmates to federally operated facilities, only 40,000 of the more than 1.5 million U.S. prisoners would be affected.

The American prison system is overwhelmingly operated by states, and state data underscores that incarceration is firmly under public-sector control.

Read the rest on Wonkblog.


 

Top policy tweets

"Trump isn't attempting any shift on the wall, on legalization, or cutting legal immigration flows. Only deportation. https://t.co/CDcCRPLmhM" -- @sahilkapur

"No seriously y'all, about this mysterious 'border wall' http://bit.ly/2bjTzDy" -- @EricaGreider

"Are they students? Or are they employees? NLRB rules that graduate students are employees. https://t.co/xmXpZSkzXW" -- @DaniDougPost

ADVERTISEMENT
 
Most Recent Posts from Wonkblog
Why film studios really like movie remakes
Studios walk a fine line between enticing viewers with something new and ruining the nostalgia that keeps film franchises alive.
 
The times of year you’re most likely to get divorced
There's a depressing seasonal predictability of divorce filings.
 
Why cute baby animal photos are actually toying with your brain
A powerful force makes us click on cute animal photos.
 
What life is really like in ‘America’s worst place to live’
The welcome has been warm, but Minnesota winter is coming.
 
 
Private prisons aren’t that big a deal
The reality is that more than 90 percent of U.S. prisoners are directly watched over by the government
 
‘They’ll kill for it': Ramen has become the black-market currency in American prisons
Instant ramen has overtaken cigarettes as the go-to currency in U.S. prisons, according to a study.
 
Mass deportation was never part of Donald Trump’s official plan to begin with
He's been saying for a year he wants to deport 11 million undocumented immigrants, but now he might be sticking to the initial plan.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
Federal Insider
Federal news and policy update, in your inbox daily.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment