 (Nikki Kahn/The Washington Post) By Keith Humphreys Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates has announced that the federal government will begin reducing its use of private prisons. Former presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, who campaigned for such a policy change, spoke for many liberal politicians when he praised the move as a major step toward reducing mass incarceration: "It is an international embarrassment that we put more people behind bars than any other country on earth. Due in large part to private prisons, incarceration has been a source of major profits to private corporations." Yet despite the outsize attention they draw in some political quarters, private prisons are bit players in the sorry drama of mass incarceration. That 19 percent of federal prisoners are in private facilities may seem to imply a massive presence of corporations within U.S. corrections, but the federal government houses only 12.7 percent of U.S. inmates. As a result, even if the Justice Department went beyond its announced plans and immediately transferred all privately housed inmates to federally operated facilities, only 40,000 of the more than 1.5 million U.S. prisoners would be affected. The American prison system is overwhelmingly operated by states, and state data underscores that incarceration is firmly under public-sector control. Read the rest on Wonkblog. Top policy tweets "Trump isn't attempting any shift on the wall, on legalization, or cutting legal immigration flows. Only deportation. https://t.co/CDcCRPLmhM" -- @sahilkapur "No seriously y'all, about this mysterious 'border wall' http://bit.ly/2bjTzDy" -- @EricaGreider "Are they students? Or are they employees? NLRB rules that graduate students are employees. https://t.co/xmXpZSkzXW" -- @DaniDougPost |
No comments:
Post a Comment