| By Max Ehrenfreund Twenty years ago, President Clinton kept a promise. "I have a plan to end welfare as we know it," he said in a television spot during his campaign for office. He did, on Aug. 22, 1996. The law that the president signed that day, together with other policies enacted by Congress and the states, profoundly changed the lives of poor … | | |  | | | | The latest economic and domestic policy from Wonkblog | | | | |  President Clinton discusses welfare reform at Vanderbilt University in Nashville on Oct. 27, 1996. (Paul J. Richards/AFP/Getty Images) By Max Ehrenfreund Twenty years ago, President Clinton kept a promise. "I have a plan to end welfare as we know it," he said in a television spot during his campaign for office. He did, on Aug. 22, 1996. The law that the president signed that day, together with other policies enacted by Congress and the states, profoundly changed the lives of poor Americans. It was intensely controversial at the time — a controversy that is heating up again today. New data on the hardships of poverty in the aftermath of the recent recession have exposed what critics say are shortcomings of welfare reform.  Clinton ended the traditional welfare system, called Aid to Families With Dependent Children, under which very poor Americans were effectively entitled to receive financial support from the federal government. In the new system, known as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, applicants must meet a range of strict requirements that vary by state to get help — working, volunteering, looking for a job or participating in skills training. | | | Here are nine things we know about how the lives of America's poor have changed. Read the rest on Wonkblog. Number of the day $14 billion. That's how much Pfizer will spend to acquire the pharmaceutical Medivation, which includes several drugs for cancer in its portfolio. Carolyn Y. Johnson has more. Top policy tweets "The world of GOP intellectuals has been upended by Donald Trump. What is there to do but carry on? https://t.co/lyzEHRswsS" -- @continetti "good piece by @dylanmatt about the implications of a 6-3 liberal SCOTUS majority https://t.co/f8UFhNbIgu" -- @ryanlcooper "This is a really smart, accessible framing of the discussion around secular stagnation and falling r* by @binarybits https://t.co/81cS7L13hz" -- @Neil_Irwin | | | | | | | | | | | ©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071 | | | | | | | | |
No comments:
Post a Comment