Friday, 19 August 2016

Fact Checker: Fact-checking the junk science behind health 'concerns' about Clinton's health

Fact-checking the junk science behind health ‘concerns’ about Clinton’s health Donald Trump repeatedly said this week that Hillary Clinton “lacks the mental and physical stamina” to be president. So we took a look at the main claims circulating right now of “concerns” over Clinton’s health — backed by junk science. Purported doctor’s records showing Clinton has …
 
Fact Checker
The truth behind the rhetoric
 
 

Fact-checking the junk science behind health ‘concerns’ about Clinton’s health

Donald Trump repeatedly said this week that Hillary Clinton “lacks the mental and physical stamina” to be president. So we took a look at the main claims circulating right now of “concerns” over Clinton’s health — backed by junk science.

Purported doctor’s records showing Clinton has seizures and vascular dementia: These records emerged on Twitter last week allegedly showing devastating medical results. Snopes.com, which basically fact-checks the Internet, quickly found they were forgeries.

Clinton demonstrates “seizure-esque” symptoms: Fox News host Sean Hannity pointed to videos of Clinton shaking her head at a group of reporters, showing his “concerns” that she was having “violent, out-of-control movements.” If you watch the video, you can tell Clinton was making an exaggerated, head-shaking movement while laughing.

Clinton needs help getting up stairs: There’s a photo of Clinton slipping on the stairs once, but there are plenty of other photos of Clinton navigating stairs with no trouble.

Clinton wears a defibrillatorPhotos showed Clinton apparently wearing a boxy contraption underneath her clothing. The bulge was not a defibrillator, but a transmitter for a wireless microphone.

Clinton is accompanied by a doctor who carries a Diazepam pen: The “doctor” was a Secret Service agent who was most likely carrying a flashlight.

FWIW, Clinton, 69, and Trump, 70, have both been deemed healthy by their doctors. We awarded Four Pinocchios to Trump for trying to surface these debunked Internet rumors through innuendo.

social_card [Tue Apr 26 2016 13-14-46 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)]

Enjoy this newsletter? Forward it to someone else who'd like it! If this e-mail was forwarded to you, sign up here for the weekly newsletter. Hear something fact-checkable? Send it here, we’ll check it out. 

About those little-c’s in Clinton emails

After we updated our rating of Hillary Clinton’s claims about classified material in her emails to Four Pinocchios, we got lots of reader email pointing to the “little C’s” that were revealed during FBI Director James Comey’s hearing in Congress.

President Bill Clinton repeated the little-C explanation during a recent speech, so we took a deep dive for readers to show why the little-C talking point does not vindicate Hillary Clinton's previous claims about classified materials. It gets really technical, so if you want the detailed version, read the full fact-check.

ADVERTISEMENT
 

The up-shot is that two of three emails that had portion markings were call sheets that were improperly marked, and State Department considers the markings no longer necessary or appropriate at the time they were sent. Comey acknowledged that Clinton may not have known what the little-C marking meant.

But the whole dispute over the little “c” is the political equivalent of three-card monte. Democrats have cherry-picked Comey's comments from the five-hour hearing to declare Hillary Clinton vindicated. But what they conveniently sweep under the rug are the 110 emails — which were not a part of the 2,000 that were retroactively classified — that were found to "contain classified information at the time they were sent or received."

The diversion to "little-C" markings is an effort to distract the public from the disturbing finding by the FBI that Clinton was "extremely careless" in handling her emails, and should have protected the information whether or not it had a classification marking.

Happy #FactCheckFriday!

We launched #FactCheckFriday, when we flood social media with the latest fact-checking by Washington Post Fact Checker. Check us out onTwitter at @myhlee, @GlennKesslerWP and @PostPolitics, Facebook Live at facebook.com/washingtonpost, and Snapchat at ‘washingtonpost.’ Send us your fact-check submissions to #FactCheckThis.

Check out our Twitter Moments round-up of the week in fact-checking.

We’ll leave you with this cartoon, which one of our colleagues dropped off at Fact Checkerland this week.

Help us find ads, statements, speeches, quotes and figures that don’t quite pass muster. Send your fact-check suggestions: fill out this form, e-mail us or tweet us at @myhlee@GlennKesslerWP or using #FactCheckThis. Read about our rating scale here, and sign up here for our weekly Fact Checker newsletter. 

Scroll down for this week’s Pinocchio round-up.

–Michelle Ye Hee Lee

 
The NRA’s false claim that Hillary Clinton doesn’t believe Americans can keep guns at home
The NRA earns Four Pinocchios for a fear-mongering ad based on little evidence but leaps of logic
 
Trump’s claim that Clinton lacks the ‘physical stamina’ to be president
Donald Trump earns Four Pinocchios for raising questions about Clinton's health based on debunked Internet rumors.
 
Trump’s claim attributing the 20-year New York City crime decline to Giuliani’s policies
Trump uses ridiculous math and flawed logic to credit Giuliani for two decades of crime decline in New York City.
 
Bill Clinton’s misleading claim about ‘marked classified’ information in Hillary Clinton’s emails
Bill Clinton repeats two favorite Democratic claims that divert attention from the most disturbing findings of Hillary Clinton's private email use.
 
Fact-checking Donald Trump’s ‘major’ speech on the Islamic State
Donald Trump once again uttered a slew of false claims that have been repeatedly debunked
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
The Daily Trail
An evening rundown of what's happening on the campaign trail.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment