Even before Trump's decision, the deal's target would be hard to hit. Now it may be impossible.; Explanation for Paris exit is based on spurious claims ; Inside Trump's decision: After fiery debate, he 'stayed where he's always been'; U.S. states, major companies break with Trump's decision to exit the climate deal; Obama offers harsh words in response, lamenting 'absence of American leadership'; Trump turns to Supreme Court to move forward on travel ban; Explanations for Kushner's meeting with head of Kremlin-linked bank don't match up; By correctly spelling 'marocain,' California girl becomes bee queen; | | | Democracy Dies in Darkness | | | | | The morning's most important stories, selected by Post editors | | | | | Trump's climate deal decision alarms leaders worldwide | "I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris," the president said in announcing the United States' abandonment of the historic, 190-nation pact. The move honors a Trump campaign pledge but jeopardizes America's alliances and stymies the global effort to address the warming planet. | By Philip Rucker and Jenna Johnson • Read more » | Fact Checker | Analysis | Explanation for Paris exit is based on spurious claims | From looking at only one side of the argument to his suggestion that the deal treated the United States unfairly, President Trump made plenty of fishy claims about the Paris Accord. Here's a round-up of his misstatements. | By Glenn Kessler and Michelle Ye Hee Lee • Read more » | | | | | Inside Trump's decision: After fiery debate, he 'stayed where he's always been' | Trump never liked the Paris climate deal. But factions inside the White House, the business community, on the world stage and in Trump's family jockeyed for influence as he decided. In the end, confidants and officials said, Trump's deliberative verdict was the same as his initial, gut-level one: The U.S. was out. | By Ashley Parker, Philip Rucker and Michael Birnbaum • Read more » | | | | | | Trump turns to Supreme Court to move forward on travel ban | The Trump administration's request elevates a divisive legal battle involving national security and religious discrimination to the nation's highest court. Justice Department lawyers asked the court to overturn a decision of the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit that maintained a freeze on President Trump's revised ban. | By Robert Barnes and Ann E. Marimow • Read more » | | | | | | | | | | | | ©2017 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071 | | | | | | | |
No comments:
Post a Comment