Friday, 23 June 2017

Act Four: A disturbance in the franchise

 
Act Four
Alyssa Rosenberg on culture and politics
 
 

Peter Mayhew stars as Chewbacca and Harrison Ford as Han Solo in "Star Wars: The Force Awakens." (Film Frame/Lucasfilm via AP)

Directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller have made some of the movies that have delighted and surprised me most in recent years, from their remake of “21 Jump Street” to the unexpected joy that was “The Lego Movie.” So when the news broke that Kathleen Kennedy, who is overseeing the unfolding “Star Wars” universe, had fired them as directors of a forthcoming movie about the young Han Solo, I felt a double loss. I wouldn’t get to see a new Lord-Miller collaboration. And I sensed a darkness in the franchise.

Let me be clear: I am, at every step of the way, rooting for all forthcoming “Star Wars” projects to be great. The “Star Wars” movies and Expanded Universe were my greatest pop culture loves as a child and young teenager, and certainly the franchise that did the most to shape my sense of what ongoing big pop culture series can be. I’m not exactly sitting around crabbily waiting for “Star Wars” to fail so we can get back to arcane French cinema (in my ideal world, we can do both).

But thus far, the “Star Wars” movies have lacked what I loved best about the original trilogy and the best of the Expanded Universe novels: a sense of clear and specific personality. (I will admit that the Force itself has always been the least interesting major part of the franchise for me, and I prefer stories on the periphery of the Jedi, or that shake up the collective sense of what the Jedi are supposed to accomplish.)

“The Force Awakens,” which I thought was the stronger of the two movies so far, and “Rogue One” have not yet had a moment that is the equivalent of Luke Skywalker’s (Mark Hamill) boast about womp rats, or a relationship even remotely equivalent to the squabbling romance between Han Solo (Harrison Ford) and Leia Organa (Carrie Fisher). The whole point of hiring directors like Lord and Miller is for their senses of humor and specifics, qualities that are exceptionally important in a movie about young Han Solo. Firing them, especially in conjunction with the two new “Star Wars” movies that have been released so far, suggests that these are not valued qualities for the new regime.

Of course, “Star Wars” will always have a chance to turn it around for me — and as a critic, whether I like it or not, I’ll be seeing and reviewing them. But I do hope that Kennedy can get to a place where she’s confident enough to experiment with tone and humor the way Marvel has done, and where she recognizes that there’s more to Star Wars than devotion to an ancient religion.

‘The Trump Show’ Season 1, Week 22, reviewed
What if this is an upstairs-downstairs soap opera that only wants to be an anti-hero drama?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
The strangeness of ‘Twin Peaks: The Return’ makes it the perfect show for 2017
"Twin Peaks: The Return" isn't about American politics. But it sounds a note that harmonizes beautifully with the strangeness of this moment.
 
Billionaires want to enlist you in their secret plans to take down the press
"Nobody Speak" is a reminder that sacrificing Gawker won't save the rest of the press.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
What we can learn from the harshest responses to Otto Warmbier’s captivity
Beyond the cruelty of certain responses to a student's North Korean captivity lies a dark and important insight about the prospects for justice in the United States.
 
There are one-and-a-half good reasons to see ‘Transformers: The Last Knight’
Yes, it's a Michael Bay movie. Yes, it's completely insane. But it's still weirdly compelling.
 
 
Recommended for you
 
 
Get the Movies newsletter
Movie news and reviews in your inbox weekly.
Sign Up  »
 
     
 
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment