Friday 30 September 2016

Act Four: Okay, fine, I'm excited for 'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them'

It's a lady's prerogative to change her mind, so I'm reversing my grumpiness about J.K. Rowling--at least for now.
 
Act Four
Alyssa Rosenberg on culture and politics
 
 

Eddie Redmayne in “Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them,” which is scheduled for release on Nov. 18. (Jaap Buitendijk/Warner Bros. Pictures via Associated Press)

For the past couple of years, I’ve been feeling increasingly peevish about J.K. Rowling’s inability to stop messing with her “Harry Potter” series, whether she’s been retroactively making the series more progressive in ways she didn’t have the courage to do the first time out or churning out supplemental material. In my defense, some of these products, like the poorly written, psychologically thin “Harry Potter and the Cursed Child,” are simply not very good.

But because it’s a woman’s prerogative to change her mind, and because I think critics should be honest with you when their feelings shift, I have to admit that the full trailer for “Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them,” a spin-off series to be set decades before the events of the “Harry Potter” books and movies, got me genuinely excited for the movie. Just when I thought I was out–well, you know how the quote goes.

It helps that it looks like “Fantastic Beasts” is going to work with some of the ideas I found interesting in the “Harry Potter” series that never got much play, among them the relationship between the mundane and magical communities. The idea of successive British prime ministers getting briefed on the existence of magic was a great idea, but one necessarily executed in a brief way. Now, it looks like we’ll see how magic, carelessly executed, could influence a U.S. presidential election. (It’s also interesting to think of people with magical abilities as a minority in the American context.)

But it also makes me feel like Rowling and her collaborators finally trust that their universe is interesting enough without the hook of the Boy Who Lived. And that ability to move beyond initial conflicts and characters is what makes for a truly great and long-lasting fictional universe, whether the Star Wars novels and games and TV shows were leaving Luke Skywalker, Darth Vader, and in some cases even the fascination with Jedi Knights behind, or whether “Star Trek” was being revitalized with each successive crew. It’s often felt like J.K. Rowling was tinkering — or tampering — with near-perfection. Now, I have hope again that she’s finally ready for an entirely new adventure in the world she gave us.

ADVERTISEMENT
 
‘Deepwater Horizon’ counts the human cost of an environmental catastrophe
Peter Berg's smart, affecting movie about a 2010 catastrophe gives its heroes room to be vulnerable.
 
‘Westworld’ is both a violent anti-hero show and a critique of the genre
These violent delights have violent ends.
 
Nike’s self-lacing shoes are our latest self-destructive nostalgia trip
Spending 10 years chasing a childhood memory suggests something's gone seriously wrong.
 
Five questions we need to answer before colonizing Mars
What kind of societies will we build, and what will we do to the planet when we live there?
 
How a Ugandan director is making great action movies on $200 budgets
Isaac Nabwana built a following on YouTube. Will Hollywood take notice?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
Intersect
The corner of the Internet and interesting, in your inbox weekly.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2016 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment