Thursday, 9 February 2017

Wonkbook: Why we should all embrace a fantastic GOP proposal to save the planet -- by Larry Summers

By Lawrence H. Summers Ideas should be judged by their quality, not their pedigree. I am not usually a fan of Republican tax policy proposals or environmental initiatives. But I strongly support the proposal put forward Wednesday by Republicans George Shultz, James Baker, Martin Feldstein, Hank Paulson, Greg Mankiw and others for a substantial carbon tax …
 
Wonkbook
The latest economic and domestic policy from Wonkblog
 
 
Steam rises from the stacks of the coal-fired Jim Bridger Power Plant outside Point of the Rocks, Wyoming in this file photo taken March 14, 2014. The U.S. power sector must cut carbon dioxide emissions 30 percent by 2030 from 2005 levels, according to federal regulations unveiled on Monday that form the centerpiece of the Obama administration's climate change strategy.  States which rely heavily on coal-fired power plants are thought to have the toughest tasks ahead.     REUTERS/Jim Urquhart/Files   (UNITED STATES - Tags: ENERGY BUSINESS POLITICS)

Steam rises from the stacks of the coal-fired Jim Bridger Power Plant outside Point of the Rocks, Wyo., in March 2014. (Jim Urquhart/Reuters)

By Lawrence H. Summers

Ideas should be judged by their quality, not their pedigree. I am not usually a fan of Republican tax policy proposals or environmental initiatives. But I strongly support the proposal put forward Wednesday by Republicans George Shultz, James Baker, Martin Feldstein, Hank Paulson, Greg Mankiw and others for a substantial carbon tax in the United States to address global climate change. Their proposal that the carbon tax be coupled with a mechanism for rebates to consumers, a rollback of command-and-control regulation, and a border adjustment mechanism is also sound.

The United States has a moral and a prudential obligation to lead on global climate change. There would be no clearer sign of our commitment than the introduction of a substantial carbon tax. Our adoption of a carbon tax would encourage others to follow. The border adjustment mechanism would be a further inducement since foreign countries would presumably prefer their carbon emitters pay them than pay us. And because a carbon tax is easy to change it would enable us to be responsive to new developments in the science of global climate change.

Some of my friends may not completely agree.

Read the rest on Wonkblog.


Top policy tweets

ADVERTISEMENT
 

— Christopher Ingraham (@_cingraham) February 9, 2017

 
Most Recent Posts from Wonkblog
Larry Summers: Why we should all embrace a fantastic Republican proposal to save the planet
It is hard to know how the Trump administration, which has flirted with climate denialism and has been less than embracing of traditional Republicans, will react to the proposal.
 
Judge blocks $54 billion Anthem-Cigna health insurance merger
"The evidence has also shown that the merger is likely to result in higher prices, and that it will have other anticompetitive effects," the judge wrote in her decision.
 
Interest in ‘fascism’ surges in the Trump era
Google searches reflect anxiety over the president.
 
The unanswered question in Trump’s announcement of a $7 billion Intel investment
The news has some analysts questioning whether the company would have made the investment anyway
 
Nordstrom broke the curse of the Trump tweet
"The president is not seen as having any particular expertise on fashion."
 
What we get wrong about mass imprisonment in America
The road of reform is a relatively harder one to walk.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Recommended for you
 
Today's WorldView
What's most important from where the world meets Washington, plus the day's most essential reads and interesting ideas.
Sign Up »
 
     
 
©2017 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment